Archive for June, 2009

Bob le Flambeur

June 18, 2009

A quintessential French crime film, enamored of its Hollywood antecedents yet distinctly French in its blasé attitude to sex, women, and the daily doldrums of the post-War Parisian male. Melville shot this over a two-year period in piecemeal fashion as finances allowed, and that explains the slipshod, somewhat chintzy, feel of many of its scenes; intentionally or not, Bob le Flambeur’s from-the-hip shooting style–using hand-held cameras in cars, on streets, etc.–helped usher in the French New Wave at the end of the ’50s. All that aside, this is, ultimately, a generally absorbing and sometimes funny look at the capricious nature of Luck.

Bob, a hardluck gambler in Paris’s Montmartre section, is on a losing streak but that doesn’t stop him from being generous to Paolo (Cauchy) and Anne (Corey), a couple of reckless, dreamy-eyed kids who look up to him. When he hits rock bottom, Bob decides to rob a Deauville casino–a haul that would make him and his co-conspirators comfortable forever. True to the heist genre, then, Melville follows Bob as he goes about financing his operation, painstakingly planning it step by step. The minutiae of Bob’s safecracker perfecting his trade is so engrossing it’s a testament of Melville’s talent for dramatizing the tropes of the crime genre. An impetuous murder and a police inspector hot on Bob’s trail wrinkle the gamblers’ plans, but Lady Luck–that most coveted and fickle of women–shows she hasn’t completely abandoned Bob, her most dedicated of suitors.

Flambeur’s casual commodification of women–going so far as to depict them as untrustworthy and emotionally disloyal tarts–is charmingly jokey up to a point, and Melville’s lurid gaze at Corey’s supple lines is enticing. But the sexual politics at play here, as Anne nearly derails Bob’s heist scheme out of nothing more than feminine whimsy feels cheap and gimmicky, as does Paolo’s girl-crazy naïveté. Still, Le Breton and Melville’s script knows how to bring it all home in a climax in which our sympathies for Bob, the lovable rogue dutifully chasing that winning streak, are marvelously realized and rewarded.

Grade: B

Directed by: Jean-Pierre Melville
Written by: Auguste Le Breton, Jean-Pierre Melville
Cast: Isabelle Corey, Daniel Cauchy, Roger Duchesne, Guy Decomble, André Garet, Gérard Buhr, Claude Cerval, Colette Fleury

Blood Diamond

June 18, 2009

blooddiamond_pic

Contrary to many who found Edward Zwick’s latest politically informed mega-production too snared in its own good intentions, I found Blood Diamond’s heart-on-its-sleeve moralism and diligent righteousness but a mildly intrusive backdrop to what is an old-fashioned adventure-romance. Leonardo DiCaprio impresses once again as Danny Archer, a cutthroat soldier of fortune from Zimbabwe, now plying his trade in Sierra Leone as a diamond smuggler. Set during the harrowing civil wars that seared through western Africa in the late 1990s, the picture’s players and premise are motivated entirely by the illegal diamond trade running rampant during that time.

DiCaprio’s Archer is an operative in the service of an army official who, in a practice common to the conflict’s corrupt leaders, is involved in the black market trading of illegally extracted diamonds for military arms. After a cache of black-market diamonds he’s attempting to smuggle across the border is confiscated, Archer’s left to scramble for another way to recover the fortune those diamonds would’ve reaped, before his bosses find and kill him. He chances on Solomon Vandy (Hounsou), a villager separated by the war from his family and who’s vowed to recover his son from the clutches of the mafia-like, anti-government militants. Archer learns that Solomon’s got the goods on a massive diamond, one he’s stashed away in a secret location near a rebel encampment, and finesses his way into Solomon’s good graces, offering to help him to find his son in exchange for the diamond. Complicating matters for Archer, though, is the gung-ho and gorgeous Maddy Bowen (Connelly), a journalist researching an article about the practice of black-market diamond smuggling used to fuel the civil war. Maddy and Archer have an instant and volatile sexual chemistry, and they exploit it to get what they want from the other. Archer agrees to proffer information vital to Maddy’s article if she’ll, in turn, help Vandy find his son. Archer’s deal, of course, is motivated by his all-consuming desire to find the hidden diamond. The push-pull polarities set up in Leavitt’s script between Archer and Maddy, and Archer and Solomon ably drive Blood Diamond’s narrative engines across the strife-torn Sierra Leone landscape.

For all of Blood Diamond’s grand scale and insistent political correctness, neither Leavitt’s script nor Zwick’s direction overplay their hand. They shrewdly stick to the immediate variables of their story, giving us glimpses into the netherworld of Sierra Leone’s civil war only when called upon by narrative necessity. This is not to say that they exploit the grimness and suffering of Africa’s misfortunes for the sake of a bloody good yarn. Rather, by affording it a place just behind the action, informing it without engulfing it, Blood Diamond packs an emotional wallop; in a storytelling strategy rare for this director, we don’t find ourselves laden with didactic demands, but, instead, swept up in an exciting narrative, free to process its moral equations on our own. In DiCaprio’s Archer, we find a psychologically scarred, morally ambiguous anti-hero after the classic Hemingway mold; Archer’s a through-and-through professional, incited by people and events to rediscover his long-compromised values. Indeed, if you’re familiar enough with the tone and tropes of Hemingway’s fiction, it’s impossible not to be reminded of them as we follow Archer’s transformation. In DiCaprio’s sensational performance and in Zwick’s committed storytelling, we find an exhilarating — if unintentional — tribute to that American master of the existential wartime action-romance.

Grade: A-

Directed by: Edward Zwick
Written by: Charles Leavitt
Cast: Leonardo DiCaprio, Djimon Hounsou, Jennifer Connelly, Kagiso Kuypers, Arnold Vosloo, Antony Coleman, Benu Mabhena, David Harewood, Jimi Mistry, Michael Sheen, Stephen Collins

The Birth of a Nation

June 16, 2009

Its racist politics aside, Birth of a Nation is a sublime example of the culmination of early Hollywood cinema. Griffith’s view — that it was not the economic rift between the North and South that threatened America after the Civil War, but the rampant and reckless exploitation by blacks on their white “civilizers” — feels so grossly and ridiculously reactionary, that it’s more quaint and buffoonish than anything remotely incendiary. I forgive Birth of a Nation its silly politics because, as an example of filmmaking, it set the standard for all Hollywood historical sagas to come.

Griffith’s mastery of the medium is at its most glorious here. His movie begins as an ode to the Old South, in the days preceding the war, and as a sprawling portrait of two families — the Stonemans of the North and the Camerons of the South. Love blossoms between members of these two politically disparate clans just as the Civil War breaks out. It’s after the war, though, when the South must suffer the indignities of Reconstruction, that Nation’s politics rears its grotesque head.

The black mobs, newly liberated, take over state legislatures and run roughshod over the genteel streets of the white South. Women are threatened with rape and the old heroes of bygone days are mocked and ridiculed by — as Griffith would have it — a bunch of scheming, lecherous Negroes. Nation gathers steam as one of the Camerons — a veteran of the war who laments the degeneration of his land and people — establishes his vigilante organization, the Ku Klux Klan. Griffith’s portrayal of the Klan as the saviors of the South — the redeeming and protective knights of besieged values — is troubling but, when viewed from a purely narrative standpoint, quite exhilarating. The ride of the Klan as they come to the rescue of a town overrun with drunken, gun-toting blacks uses sophisticated cross-cutting, juxtaposition, and all those cinematic devices to startlingly modern, suspenseful effect.

Can you enjoy Birth of a Nation as a purely cinematic experience? Of course! Just take its politics with a grain of salt, and you will come away fascinated by its old-world vision of America and awed by Griffith’s unerring gift for storytelling on film. This is a masterpiece that still packs a punch and whose standard-bearing genius remains untarnished.

Grade: A+

Directed by: D.W. Griffith
Written by: D.W. Griffith, Frank E. Woods, Thomas F. Dixon, Jr.
Cast: Lillian Gish, Mae Marsh, Henry B. Walthall, Ralph Lewis

Beyond the Sea

June 16, 2009

The LA Weekly was right: Beyond the Sea was the most misunderstood movie of 2004. It’s not a straight biopic but a study of the idea of immortality–which is particularly poignant here given that the subject is Bobby Darin, a performer who lived in the shadow of death due to cardiac problems he had since he was a child. Kevin Spacey’s dedication is clear, both in his performance as Darin and in his wonderful direction, crafting a pastiche of styles borrowed from , Citizen Kane, and West Side Story. That last film came to mind as I watched the sumptuous and entertaining musical numbers–drenched in beautifully photographed primary colors! This is clearly a labor of love for Spacey, and he deserves great credit for taking on a stale genre and livening it up with a terrific performance and a sharp directorial eye. Another extraordinary performance comes from William Ullrich who plays Darin as a child and re-appears throughout the movie, representing Darin’s younger soul, the corporeal part of him fated for an early death. Spacey and Ullrich have a great song-and-dance scene together and their interaction is sad and profound. The weakest link in Spacey’s movie is the script itself–co-written by him and Lewis Colick. Its charting of Darin’s rise to fame is strictly connect-the-dots; Darin’s stardom, as depicted here, never quite feels earned and clips along in a rather predictable fashion. Otherwise, kudos to Spacey for his courageous efforts.

Grade: B

Directed by: Kevin Spacey
Screenplay by: Kevin Spacey, Lewis Colick
Cast: Kevin Spacey, Kate Bosworth, John Goodman, Bob Hoskins, William Ullrich

The Battle of Algiers

June 15, 2009

Pontecorvo’s exhilarating political saga covers the insurgency by Algerian militants against the French occupation of Algiers between the early ’50s and the mid-60s (when Algeria won its independence). What’s so arresting straight off about the film is the nervy, seemingly disjointed fusion of documentary-style realism and more conventional narrative strategies as it follows Ali La Pointe (Brahmin Hadjadj), a young Algerian nationalist, and his involvement in the FLN, an organization devoted to the liberation of their homeland from the hands of the French colonialists. Under the orders of their headstrong commander, Djafar (Yacef Saadi), the FLN rampantly employs terrorist tactics and assassinations directed at the colonial residents of their city, and, on this count, Battle of Algiers is unsparing — depicting violence full-on, whether perpetrated in the mass-space of cafés or at point-blank range of the militants’ targets.

As Pontocorvo takes us deeper into the lives of its various characters, and into the daily rhythms of life in the Casbah district of Algiers, home to much of its Arabic population, we begin to feel a kinship with their struggle. This is not just a ragtag group of scruffy, discontented men who decide to direct their rage against the System, but an intricate pyramidal chain of command whose members work intently to unshackle chains forged by 130 years of colonial oppression. And not just men, the struggle involves women resistors too, and Pontecorvo singles out three, all of whom resign to get their hands bloody for the cause. In one of Algiers’ gamut of extraordinary sequences, we follow the women as they sneak past French checkpoints and into the city’s European quarters on a bombing mission. Such scenes are not easy to watch, for the deaths of innocent civilians can hardly be justified under any circumstances. But it’s a double-edged sword as the film’s makers are shrewd to point out. They make sure to give equal time to the often brutal retaliatory measures employed by the French army, including (surprising considering the time when it was made) candidly shot scenes of torture.

Tonally, the film almost founders under the weight of its political gravity and a screenplay that can’t find adequate footing with any of its characters. That is, until the arrival of Col. Mathieu (Jean Martin), a hard-nosed militaryman hired to bring order to the increasingly chaotic city. Here’s when Algiers snaps awake as a crackling socio-political thriller. Mathieu institutes a rigorous system of crackdowns and interrogation. A veteran of the anti-Nazi resistance, he decides the only way to destroy the FLN is to charge his way to the top of its executive chain and bring down Djafar. Hence, Algiers builds, not on the backs of any single character, but as an anthemic recall of historic vignettes.

Pontecorvo, together with his cinematographer Marcello Gatti and editors Mario Morra and Mario Serandrei, patch together a kind of rough-hewn, blood-spattered quilt that honors the Algerian resistance, rising to a climactic sequence brilliantly recreating a mass street demonstration. The off-handedness of Algiers’ style is highly deceptive when one considers the logistics and special effects deployed masterfully during its frentic action- and crowd-filled passages. And weaved into this gritty fabric is the uncannily gorgeous music by Pontecorvo and Ennio Morricone — blending Arabic strains with Morricone’s haunting guitar notes. The score for Battle of Algiers sets an indelible mood of danger, desperation and the irony of victory when weighed against the losses incurred along the way.

Inevitably, given the times we live in, what really resonates on watching Algiers is its message about the widespread loss of civilian life and the staggering destruction to civic infrastructure as the heaviest costs of violent uprisings. Above that, we learn the harsh lesson that all occupations are doomed to fail. The Pentagon apparently screened Battle of Algiers in 2003, the year of the U.S. invasion of Iraq. Considering our actions in the years’ since, it’s clear that, having learned nothing from history (nor taken much heed to this film), we are in the midst of repeating it.

Grade: A

Directed by: Gillo Pontecorvo
Written by: Gillo Pontecorvo, Franco Solinas
Cast: Brahmin Hadjadi, Jean Martin, Yacef Saadi, Samia Kerbash, Ugo Paletti, Fusia El Kader, Omar

Batman Begins

June 15, 2009

batmanbegins_pic

The script for Batman Begins by Christopher Nolan and David S. Goyer scores on certain levels, but, as narrative, it lacks clearly drawn lines between “good” and “evil.” In short, it’s a mess: We have the League of Shadows, we have Bruce Wayne’s corporate empire, we have Gotham’s criminal underworld, and we have the cops who are in bed with the criminals. Then, towards the end, we have that bit about the looneys being set loose from the asylum (this isn’t much of a spoiler, just a detail). All of these disparate and wholly independent factors are then jumbled together in Nolan and Goyer’s cuisinart of a script, and, honestly, we have no idea “where to look,” so to speak,” due to its muddled, unconvincing narrative arc, the climax of which feels extremely contrived. The overall story feels a lot more frenzied than it needs to be, and by the end you can hear the movie wheezing as it strains to wring every last gasp of suspense from its plotline. What happened to the ideal of a pure, clear-cut hero vs. villain story, the kind we saw realized to perfection in Mario Puzo’s script for Superman?

The performances range from cutie-pie Katie Holmes’ passable limning of Rachel Dawes to Morgan Freeman’s delightfully dapper Lucius Fox and Liam Neeson’s decently villainous Henry Ducard. Michael Caine (Alfred) and Rutger Hauer (Earle) fill their shoes satisfactorily and collect their paychecks. Gary Oldman (Gordon) just tries not to look too embarrassed, the fey Cillian Murphy (Crane) hams it up (badly), all while Christian Bale seems hardly able to breathe in his lead role. Bale’s Bruce Wayne/Batman is a grim, scowling sourpuss. Sure, the character has every reason to be in a bad mood, but what we need–finally!–is a superhero performance that feels natural, guileless. I was desperate for Bale’s Bruce Wayne to say something off-handed, crack a joke, relax those stiffened shoulders. This is the curse of playing Wayne, I think, and it’s one that’s affected everyone who ever played him, including Michael Keaton (my favorite of the contemporary ones). Let’s get over it, folks! This is not serious psychodrama; it’s just a comic book character. At least the 60′s TV show had the good sense to put that in perspective with its campy, melodramatic attitude and perhaps that’s why Adam West’s campier Bruce Wayne might’ve been the perfect interpretation of what is, in essence, a pulp character.

Anyway, none of this is to say that I didn’t like Batman Begins. It’s passable entertainment that our culture has wildly overrated. To put it into a bit of perspective, Bryan Singer’s work in X-Men might’ve had more flair while Nolan just seems straitjacketed in this material. He seems to have jettisoned the exhilaration of making a movie in place of earning the imprimatur of being a bankable director, someone capable of churning out consumable, mass market “entertainment.”

Grade: B-

Directed by: Christopher Nolan
Written by: Christopher Nolan, David S. Goyer
Cast: Christian Bale, Michael Caine, Liam Neeson, Katie Holmes, Gary Oldman

The Aviator

June 15, 2009

Slam-bang full-throttle entertainment, and maybe the closest Scorsese will ever get to populist moviemaking. The Aviator feels like old-fashioned Hollywood with a bracing jolt of Scorsese’s cinematic flair. The cinematography and editing are both trademark Scorsese–visceral and expressive–while the production and costume design are impeccably “classic” Hollywood. DeCaprio delivers a riveting Howard Hughes in a hard-edged performance reminiscent of the tortured obsessives that DeNiro once played for Scorsese. Cate Blanchett, playing Kate Hepburn, proves again her dazzling genius, skillfully navigating her way through a role that, by its nature, could’ve turned into parody. But Blanchett plays Kate like a full-blooded human being, not a collection of eccentric tics and mannerisms that would’ve dogged a lesser talent. Credit John Logan’s intelligent script for avoiding pitfalls into clichés of biopic high-handedness. His script and Scorsese’s direction combine to bring us a closely felt, impassioned examination of Hughes’ life–its highs of ambition and celebrity and its lows of neurotic debilitation and political scandal. A terrific accomplishment for all involved, and Scorsese’s best film since Goodfellas.

Grade: A-

Directed by: Martin Scorsese
Written by: John Logan
Cast: Leonardo DiCaprio, Cate Blanchett, Kate Beckinsale, John C. Reilly, Alec Baldwin

The Aristocrats

June 15, 2009

Thoroughly middle of the road doc that tries to deconstruct a legendary vaudeville joke replete with incest, scatology, sodomy, bestiality and all that fun stuff. The snag is that none of those aforementioned hobbies is inherently all that funny, and neither is the joke itself. The repertoire of comedians on display here, all doing their schtick, sometimes hits a comic bulls-eye so, really, it’s all in the execution. Still, one has to wonder did this material deserve a ninety-minute running time? Well, no. A half-hour uncensored segment on Comedy Central might’ve been more appropriate. And another thing: The Aristocrats is appallingly edited. It’s as if the filmmakers tossed all their footage into a cuisinart and cranked it on high. The editing is erratic, breathless, and hugely irritating–quite ironic, I think, considering that comedy is all about rhythm and timing, neither of which this documentary maintains particularly well. A tedious dud that sparks once or twice with big laughs.

Grade: C

Directed by: Paul Provenza
Cast: Jason Alexander, Hank Azaria, David Brenner, Drew Carey, George Carlin, Billy Connolly, Andy Dick, Phyllis Diller, Whoopi Goldberg, Gibert Gottfried, Eric Idle, Larry Miller, Martin Mull, Bob Saget, Sarah Silverman

Andrei Rublev

June 14, 2009

A strange and most challenging film, Andrei Rublev is a dreamy, sooty, black-and-white chronicle set against early 15th century Russian history. Tarkovsky is fascinated with images of nature, animals, natural processes, and he allows them to add another layer of meaning to the human strife playing out in the foreground. I’m not sure what Rublev is completely about but the trick is to ride along with it, as it soon becomes a beautiful and wondrous sort of cinematic experience, played out against the rhythms of galloping horses or the falling rain, and the veil-like shrouds of rain and snow. Tarkovsky’s parable concerns the titular monk-painter struggling with reconciling his relationship with the church and his own personal morality, with the purpose of art in the midst of so much injustice and turmoil. Intimate and grittily shot, this isn’t so much a biopic (Rublev sometimes isn’t even directly involved in much of the action, rather just an observer swept up in the tide of historical events), so much as a philosophical tract as pondered by its director over its long but always hypnotic telling.

Grade: A-

Directed by: Andrei Tarkovsky
Written by: Andrei Konchalovsky, Andrei Tarkovsky
Cast: Anatoli Solonitsyn, Ivan Lapikov, Nikolai Grinko, Nikolai Sergeyev

Anatomy of Hell

June 14, 2009

This horridly tasteless lump of a movie points to how Catherine Breillat is another modern filmmaker who, along with Michael Heneke, Lars von Trier, and Bruno Dumont, is reducing cinema to nothing but a medium for turgid intellectual dross. It isn’t necessarily pretentious. Its design, rather, is straightforward and symmetrical through which Breillat expresses her views clearly and succinctly. Yet there is absolutely no reason for this movie to exist. This is a model of wasted ideas featuring two pissy excuses for actors (Siffredi, by the way, is a popular Italian porn star with Anatomy being his bid for mainstream legitimacy). While the ideas expressed by the aforementioned rabble of filmmakers are certainly legitimate, their decision to strip cinema of any semblance of human substance, even-handedness, and an open-minded attention to the needs of storytelling make their work by and large excruciating to sit through. Anatomy of Hell, as a result, is a stodgy, turgid parable about sexual politics as an incomprehensibly stolid woman makes a deal with a woman-hating gay man to explore the nature of sexuality with her. They moodily ponder how men have historically subjugated women out of fear–an interesting enough theme to be sure, but there’s nothing revolutionary about it. Worse yet, the sparse, repetitive structure and archetypal schematics make this tripe impossible to digest. I could follow the whole menstrual-blood banter up to a point, before it became a ridiculous, nauseating display of one man overcoming his fear of menses by swilling it down cocktail-style. A waste of cinema, and of precious time. Nice try, Breillat…but no tampon.

Grade: F

Directed by: Catherine Breillat
Written by: Catherine Breillat
Cast: Amira Casar, Rocco Siffredi


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 481 other followers