Archive for September, 2009

Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles

September 29, 2009

jeanne dielman_pic2

Chantal Ackerman broke new ground in non-traditional narrative filmmaking with this provocative fusion of formal experimentation and feminist polemic. Indeed, watching Jeanne Dielman through its 200 minute running time is really tracking an increasingly ironic relationship between form and content. The form in this case is remarkably spartan — a regulated system of (mostly) wide shots and flat, almost proscenium framing that, with sometimes painful deliberation, follows the eponymous character, a widow living with her son in a Brussels apartment, as she goes through her days, performing a series of quotidian tasks.

The film follows Jeanne over three days, and we watch her cook, clean, run errands, and tend to her teenage son (who, for my money, is an aloof, pathologically strange lad). Her life and home are orderly but alienated, never do her emotions overtake her, and we wonder if she’s simply switched that part of her brain off owing to grief and loneliness since her late husband’s death. The fact that she supports herself and her son by prostituting herself — she sees her clients during the day in her apartment while her son is at school — adds a significant quality of emotional denial, withdrawal, and self-loathing to her character that informs her overall temperament. But Jeanne is not immune to the consequences of her actions, she isn’t impervious to the breakdown that steals over her gradually over the film’s three-day time frame. Anomalies take shape as she unravels: She forgets to turn off light switches, drops a spoon while drying utensils, overcooks the potatoes, that kind of thing. Also, her manner turns more garrulous in inverse proportion to the coldness that marked her persona during the first half of the story.

It’s a structuralist approach to character development and how much you appreciate it depends on your enthusiasm for, well, Structuralist Cinema. You may not predict the final shock to her system — when her mind briefly, violently snaps back to life — but you may wonder if all the fastidiousness of Ackerman’s project was worth the build-up. Thirty-five years since her film’s release, Jeanne Dielman’s sense of feminist outrage feels somehow pat and simplistic, like the intellectualized vitriol of a too-young female filmmaker (Ackerman was 25 when she made this) against the injustices of a woman’s social and sexual imprisonment in a man’s world.

At the end of the day, Jeanne Dielman is more provocative and admirable for its style than its substance. While Dielman herself is a fascinating character — played with cool precision by Delphine Seyrig — her interior life is kept too buttoned-up; we spend too long guessing at what must surely be worlds of motives and counter-motives swirling beneath her placid surface, at a far more fascinating picture we can only imagine, and Ackerman’s film is too long for that kind of parlor game. Whether you rally around the film’s feminist premise has little to do with its value as art, experiment, narrative, or even entertainment (or a self-conscious form of anti-entertainment), and, in those departments, Jeanne Dielman can initially absorb, fascinate but, ultimately, ends up less than the sum of its parts.

Grade: B-

Directed by: Chantal Ackerman
Written by: Chantal Ackerman
Cast: Delphine Seyrig, Jan Decorte, Henri Storck, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze, Yves Bical

(500) Days of Summer

September 20, 2009

500days_pic

There’s nothing in Marc Webb’s (500) Days of Summerthat we didn’t get in more substantial form in better romantic, anti-romantic dramedies. It’s note of romantic pining bears echoes of Say Anything but it’s treatment of the therapeutic powers of love in an otherwise miserable, doubt-fraught existence was far more richly examined in Greg Mottola’s Adventureland. Granted Adventureland was a more serious-minded fare, and (500) Days is lighter and more fanciful venture, pepped up with tunes that comprise what could be the hipster-pop soundtrack of the year. Yet, for all its heart-on-its-sleeve good intentions, the script by Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber simply doesn’t offer up a deep, searching treatment of sexual infatuation, the fickleness of romance, and the mysteries of love with anything like compelling, lasting impact.

Webb’s movie is a goofy send-up on said themes while meaning to be, off-handedly, something much more as it follows Tom Hansen (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), an aspiring architect who’s now slumming as a greeting-card writer, and his efforts to woo and win the love of his co-worker, the ethereally pretty Summer (Zooey Deschanel). Brooding, serious and sincere, Tom is the temperamental opposite to the easy-breezy Summer, who’s allergic to commitment and enamored of whimsy and the spontaneous romantic impulse. This makes Summer an easy person to get intrigued by, but a hard person to care about in the long run. As a character, she’s as light and wispy as, well, a summer breeze, and aptly fits Film Critic Nathan Rubin’s template of the Manic Pixie Dream Girl; Summer exists solely to light Tom’s fire, excite his soul, redeem his believe in love and himself, but, as someone independent of those functions, she’s a cipher, an exasperating blank — a woman who says she doesn’t care for commitment until the script requires her to do so.

Deschanel, with her dreamy eyes and lilting delivery, makes for the perfect MPDG muse for the lovelorn, tortured artist, enjoyably played by the hotly talented Gordon-Levitt, who’s now spent almost a decade developing impeccable cred in the American indie and non-mainstream circuit. Gordon-Levitt is the sole reason this sweet but feathery affair assumes any gravity at all — he lends a soulful credibility to a film generally populated by cut-outs and cliches. Among the latter are Tom’s two longtime sidekicks, McKenzie (Geoffrey Arend) and Paul (Matthew Gray Gubler) — who stand in, respectively, for the Sad Sack Who’s Never Had a Girlfriend and for The Lifer with the Same Girlfriend Since Forever. They stand at the polar ends of the “modern love” spectrum on which Tom slides tenuously back an d forth. But, like Summer, they’re simply functionaries in a story built like a music box: pretty and pleasing to listen to, but all cogs and gears within.

Another of (500) Days’ good intentions is to vindicate the aesthetic reputation of Los Angeles, a city that gets short-shrift as an eyesore too often in popular culture. By way of Tom’s love of downtown L.A. (where he lives, in a spacious loft), Webb wants to fashion a tender valentine to the architectural splendors of his city. For L.A. lovers like myself, this is a noble and much-needed gesture, and the scenes in which Tom fills Summer (and the rest of us) in on the history and design of the city’s heritage skyscrapers are genuinely sweet. But the city fails to become an organic part of this story; it rather remains an entity separate and apart from the central action, something characters have to remember to stare at, acknowledge and adore. As a result, Webb’s Los Angeles setting becomes simply the gilt framing for a lovely postcard picture of what is a nicely played but all-too-preciously eccentric romance.

Grade: C+

Directed by: Marc Webb
Written by: Scott Neustadter, Michael H. Weber
Cast: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Zooey Deschanel, Geoffrey Arend, Matthew Gray Gubler, Clark Gregg, Chloe Moretz


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 481 other followers