Archive for April, 2010

Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle

April 29, 2010

As an Indian-American, I’m grateful for Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle, mostly because it features someone of my ethnicity as a lead performer. Now, is it offensive and does it perpetuate stereotypes? Yes, gleefully so, and not just the Indian stereotype and the Asian stereotype, but also the stereotype of the urban African-American, the Jew, the pot-smoking white hippie, the Brit skank, the white hooligan, the mustached white police, the white inbred redneck, every damn type under the politically incorrect sun. Harold & Kumar is the Animal House of the new millennium: it’s suffused in pot haze; full of randy, topless women; and a lot of rowdy, unapologetic humor (by the way, all you’ve heard about Neil Patrick Harris’ cameo is true: it’s mortifying and pretty hilarious.)

Harold & Kumar knows that we, collectively, can’t get along (the likeminded and like-raced stick together and either wage war against or seek refuge from the warmongers who form the dominant majority–in this case, the whole spectrum of dimwitted suburban America), and has fun skewering these simple racial perceptions. The plot is easy enough: the title roommates, after smoking a whole lotta dope, hit the road searching for the nearest White Castle to satisfy their craving for the title fast-food franchise’s burgers. A lot of high jinks, tangents, raucousness and hilarity ensue, all of it fast-paced and unselfconscious. Watch this one stoned, drunk, neither, both–I won’t hold you to anything. Whatever the case, it’s a whacky, racially refreshing breather in Hollywood’s white-dominated, politically over-correct bummer of a mainstream culture.

Grade: A-

Directed by: Danny Leiner
Written by: Jon Hurwitz, Hayden Schlossberg
Cast: John Cho, Kal Penn, Paula Gracés, Neil Patrick Harris, Fred Willard, Eddie Kaye Thomas

Happy Together

April 29, 2010

How does Wong Kar Wai do it? He has this preternatural gift for film style–few modern filmmakers have his graceful command of the medium in conjuring moods and emotions. Happy Together is an incredible example of that gift, telling the story of two gay expatriate lovers who’ve left Hong Kong for a sojourn in Buenos Aires. One of them gets a job at a restaurant while the other lays about the boarding house where they’ve shacked up.

They break up and get back together again. Their bliss is short-lived, though, because jealousies soon creep in and they’re right back to where they started from before they realize that they need to seek their destinies separately. There isn’t much to it. The power, though, of this movie is all in Wan Kar-Wai’s imagemaking–he begins with gritty black-and-white then slowly saturates the movie with pulpy colors as the characters’ relationship evolves. The best term that I can think of for this movie’s style is “Vérité Chic”–it uses this jostling “guerilla” technique but the cinematographer Christopher Doyle, the genius that he is, tricks out the images with filters and does very innovative things that I can’t begin to understand, all of which lend Happy Together this subtle but undeniable sense of yearning.

While Argentina’s landscape and culture lend the movie its authenticity, its sense of place, it never becomes travelogue-ish. Rather, the vitality of Buenos Aires is shot so expressively that it augments the movie’s youthful themes. This is all-around fabulous work that deservedly won Wong a Best Director prize at the 1997 Cannes Film Festival.

Grade: A-

Directed by: Wong Kar Wai
Written by: Wong Kar Wai
Cast: Leslie Cheung, Tony Leung, Chen Chang, Gregory Dayton

Good Night, and Good Luck

April 29, 2010

In Good Night, and Good Luck, George Clooney has made a very earnestly felt diatribe against political recklessness but somebody really needed to give him and his co-writer Grant Heslov a lesson in dramatic tension and character development. It seemed that Clooney (who I really admire and respect) was more interested using the movie medium as a pulpit from which to pontificate his political beliefs rather than in telling a dramatically engaging story.

Parts of Good Night make for truly vivid cinema–the recreations of the 50′s-era milieu (though it never ventures outside CBS news rooms, executive offices and the local drinking hole)-and it really made me wonder about what life must’ve been like in Cold War America (when cigarette commercials were allowed on TV). I also appreciated Clooney’s decision to shoot in black-and-white, often with nervy pan-and-zooms (which brought to mind the kinescope look and feel of TV of that time). And the whole cast is up to the task. The problem, though, is, while David Stathairn gives a capable performance as Edward Murrow–the CBS broadcast journalist who decides to question America’s complacent tolerance of MacCarthy’s anti-Communist witch hunt–there’s very little beneath the movie’s surfaces. We know nothing of Murrow, the human being; what we know of him are the words of political rhetoric that he recites nightly on his news program. I think a really brilliant, incisive script would’ve delved deeper into both Murrow and the nuances of American culture that he cautioned and railed against–and still kept within the rigors of the Clooney’s sparse mise-en-scène.

As it is, we have endlessly protracted archival footage of the Un-American hearings. Such scenes, to my mind, do not count as screenwriting but, rather, as lazy efforts to pad out a running time. Clooney’s extended use of such footage does nothing to raise the movie’s dramatic temperature. And what exactly does the final third of this movie accomplish? It contains no real dramatic intensification, nothing that really surprises us, playing out as business-as-usual in the American television game. I kept wondering: just what is the drama here? Is there any? Is there a compelling narrative being played out here? Part of what we get–a background storyline concerning a covertly married couple played by Patricia Clarkson and Robert Downey Jr–really stretches this already-thin material beyond what it can plausibly handle.

Grade: C+

Directed by: George Clooney
Screenplay by: George Clooney, Grant Heslov
Cast: David Stathairn, Robert Downey Jr., Patricia Clarkson, George Clooney, Frank Langella, Jeff Daniels

Grizzly Man

April 25, 2010

You know when Werner Herzog makes a documentary, it’s not going to content itself with your typical PBS/Discovery Channel sort of informational objectivity but get into the realm of personal moviemaking. In Grizzly Man, Herzog tries to come to grips with the life and death of the oddball/self-styled naturalist Timothy Treadwell, who devoted the last 13 years of his life to “protecting” the habitat and welfare of a colony of Alaskan grizzly bears.

Treadwell is an immensely compelling personality (something of a poet in how he expresses himself), and Herzog relies a great deal on the found footage which Treadwell shot of himself communing with the bears, bees, foxes and which traces the downward spiraling of his own mind. Gradually, Treadwell becomes convinced that he has a special bond with nature, particularly with the grizzlies that he watches over, and that the human world is constantly threatening his spiritually given charge (though the bears in question are all a part of federally protected land). Treadwell, on some level, operates with incredibly selfless courage and compassion. He continues his private crusade, living for months on end in utter isolation, recording his adventures with a video camera, and roughing it while camped down on grounds he knows are dangerous. That is, until October, 2003 when he and his girlfriend are attacked and savagely killed by a grizzly (the kind of death that Treadwell fears, prophesies and continually reminds us of throughout his videotaped in-the-field testimonies).

Herzog’s movie is an attempt to understand Treadwell–where he came from, what made him tick, and why he took it upon himself to do what he did and die the way he did. Herzog comes to Treadwell’s defense, in awe of the man’s manic obsession and total devotion to his cause (no surprise, because Herzog has always been fascinated by obsessive personalities — see My Best Fiend, his documentary about his love/hate relationship with madman-actor Klaus Kinski). Herzog interviews Treadwelll’s parents, a former girlfriend, others who knew him and those who remain confounded by his actions and beliefs, naturalists and eco-biologists among them. Particularly chilling is the interview with the charter-plane pilot who ferried Treadwell for years to and from the Alaskan island where he spent his summers and, finally, found his and his girlfriend’s remains. It’s gruesome testimony. Even more so is the coroner’s recollection of the remains and of the audiotaped evidence of Treadwell and his girlfriend’s ill-fated encounter with the ravenous grizzly, which Herzog himself cannot bring himself to endure fully.

Clearly, Treadwell lived in his head — he was an arrested pre-pubescent who lived out in the wilds as if it were fantasyland, investing it with a child-like sense of awe, wonder, and danger — and this is not meant to be endearing, rather it becomes more and more a sign of a seriously deluded mind.

The conclusion that Herzog brings us to–that Treadwell’s intensity has to be honored, but also that his is a cautionary tale, reminding us that nature has no friends nor foes. It simply follows its patterns, cycles, its laws with a unwavering, indifferent eye. It has no sense of compassion or allegiance, nothing guiding it but its own self-preservation. And those who don’t understand that will soon enough pay the same price as Treadwell.

Grade: A

Directed by: Werner Herzog
Screenplay by: Werner Herzog

The Girl on the Bridge

April 25, 2010

An incredibly odd little romance on fairly conventional lines: boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy gets girl, but all of it done up with a bizarre sense of tone that makes it well worth the ride. The Girl on the Bridge is like a hybrid of Chaplin and David Lynch but not profound enough to measure up to the former and not dark and odd enough for the latter. Still, Patrice Laconte achieves something so unusual–a kind of magical realism in black-and-white–that you can’t help but keep watching: The movie is about a suicidally depressed young waif (Vanessa Paradis) who’s really a pushover for a pickup line and for age-old notions about romantic love. She takes up with a knife-thrower (the always-splendid Daniel Auteuil) and together they set off from one circus gig to another. Their relationship is charged, sexually, though they don’t even so much as kiss during the entire film. The metaphor of the knife-throwing as sex act, one that combines impulses of fear and trust into an erotic experience, is remarkable, especially due to Paradis’ most convincing show of swooning against the boards. Leconte’s humor is whacky, sometimes surreal, and his assured direction yields delightfully seriocomic performances. I do wish the script had taken more chances, especially with regard to Auteuil’s character (to make him, say, even more emotionally distant), but Girl is still an oddly amusing and touching work.

Grade: B

Directed by: Patrice Leconte
Screenplay by: Serge Frydman
Cast: Vanessa Paradis, Daniel Auteuil, Frédéric Pfluger, Demetre Georgalas

Garden State

April 25, 2010

Garden State is about as good “indie” cinema gets these days. I use the term “indie” to mean those movies not financed by the big-budget divisions of the majors. It’s basically a superfluous term now unless you’re talking about a boldly personal, political, or aesthetic mission on the part of an artist working well outside the mainstream.

“Indie” movies, then, now lie squarely in the realm of the mediocre-but-watchable. Twenty-something filmmakers/writers/artists assaying difficult life topics as their subjects generally misfire with awfully precious, immature and false work. They ought to stick to material like Rush Hour and American Pie sequels–thematically easy-to-digest material that they can handle. The new generation of American filmmakers might be enthusiastic (you can’t make movies otherwise), but they have absolutely no sense of daring, originality or flair for the medium the way Cassavetes and his generation did. What is Tarantino, for instance, but a pasticheur who lifts entire ideas from other filmmakers who did it better the first time. To his credit, Tarantino has never tried to be a poet of the soul, never aspired to such a thing because he doesn’t have a soulful idea in him, and he knows it. So he wisely sticks to torturously contrived executions of secondhand material (with the exception, let me point out, of his lovely Jackie Brown).

Back to Garden State: This tepid comedy-drama about the unlikely love that blooms between a neurotic actor and a giggly, vivacious Jersey girl has enough moments of sweetness and truth to redeem its indie pretensions. The movie was directed by its star, Zach Braff, a TV actor, and, as such, has absolutely no cinematic signature. Braff’s staging is flat and he relies readily on smooth, arcing boom shots that feel out-of-place in material that purports to be so grounded in life’s simplicities.

A few good moments and spot-on dialogue save Garden State from hip du jour oblivion. Then again, the same can be said for 99 percent of the so-called “indie cinema” of the past fifteen years. Just because a filmmaker espouses the ideals of homegrown, anti-Hollywood cinema means nothing: There’s still the small matter of having something truthful to convey and, more than that, the cinematic chops and the poet’s soul to give it form. The same goes for all the Sundancey titles like that indie lump of cheese whiz, The Station Agent. Take it away before I throw up, and pass me my copy of Rush Hour.

Another huge gripe with Braff’s movie: What’s with the wall-to-wall, almost whorish, adherence to the indie-pop soundtrack? If he weren’t busy posturing as a storyteller, Braff would do well to sign on as a shill for The Shins and spare the rest of us the brunt of his filmmaking ambitions.

Is specious dreck like this the best that indie cinema can come up with nowadays, in its desperate flailing for something quirky, honest? Garden State, All the Real Girls, Donnie Darko. If not such overcooked trifle, we get the bloated inanities from film brat like P.T. Anderson who thinks he’s doing something Important. My advice to them and filmmakers of that ilk who would commit stories to celluloid: Follow Christopher Nolan’s lead and stick to Hollywood factory filmmaking. Hone your craft and resist attempts at “personal” filmmaking.

It almost seems that modern American culture, with its incessant and pervasive big media influences, has bled the “individuality” out of its popular arts. We don’t experience our own lives anymore so much as draw on lives and values absorbed from advertising, TV, and movies. The last two generations have been saturated with values of consumerism and paranoia at the absence of individual creative development–a group cultural phenomenon I like to call zombification. Garden State, with its bland and desperate humor, is symptomatic of zombification, and, as sad as it sounds, the quintessential product by and for uninspired times.

Grade: C

Directed by: Zach Braff
Witten by: Zach Braff
Cast: Zach Braff, Natalie Portman, Peter Sarsgaard, Jean Smart, Ann Dowd, Alex Burns

The 40-Year-Old Virgin

April 25, 2010

Judd Apatow’s sex comedy takes a while to find its legs but it hits its stride eventually, and keeps us rooting for it in the meantime thanks to its honesty and sweetness. Apatow (best known, at least to me, as the mastermind behind TV’s woefully short-lived Freaks & Geeks) wrote the script along with Steve Carell but, as funny as several of their scenes are, their movie feels overloaded with scenes that don’t add up to enough in story terms: It seems they tried to work in as much of the ad-libbed moments into their written script as they could, and, as a result, the momentum of their movie drags a bit. The overall comic energy, hence, only simmers when it ought to be at full wattage and powering a movie that should’ve been of much shorter duration. The 40-Year-Old Virgin is nearly two hours–a gratuitous running time in a genre that demands fast, concise execution. Still, there’s so much charm to Virgin, and its performers clearly are having such a blast with the material that the fun is infectious. It’s a privilege to watch a cast like this–to sense that these perfomers had as much fun with the material as we have in experiencing it. It’s a beautiful relationship that way.

Andy is living in denial. He’s shunned himself from sex, from any notion of ever having sex after an adolescence and young adulthood riddled with sexual debacles. To compensate for his sexual inadequacies, he’s filled his bachelor pad with hundreds of action-figure collectibles. And when he isn’t wiling away the hours at his “video game chair” or meticulously painting his vast collection of toy soldiers, he’s hawking electronics goods at Smart Tech–a retailer after the Best Buy/Circuit City mold. When his co-workers catch on to Andy’s virgin status, they all rally around him, ready to help him get laid. Needless to say, their tips and schemes are all disastrous in one way or another. But Andy’s a good-natured bloke and a good sport, so he keeps his chin up and takes the various embarrassments in stride.

When quirky and beautiful Trish (Catherine Keener) enters Andy’s life, things suddenly look up: The two hit it off instantly but what troubles Andy, of course, is how he’ll broach the delicate issue of his sexual inexperience with a girlfriend who’s not only divorced and a mom but, ahem, a grandma (a HOT grandma) to boot. Anyway, the story takes its time unraveling these threads. The relationships are well-developed, convincing, and wonderfully played by a Apatow’s tight ensemble (which includes Freaks & Geeks cast member Seth Rogen). Carell turns in a performance that’s at once farcical and sincere, and his Andy earns our total sympathies along the way. Carell and Apatow know are mining comic gold here: Their reflections on men’s attitude towards women, towards the wonders of the female sex organ (the “pussy-on-a-pedestal” bit scores a bulls-eye), and towards the way men relate to women all have a ring of truth about them. The 40-Year-Old Virgin may not be as whip-smart in its pacing and attitude as it could’ve been in hands less affectionate towards the material, but its proves that old adage about all good comedy: It’s funny because it’s true.

Grade: B

Directed by: Judd Apatow
Written by: Judd Apatow, Steve Carell
Cast: Steve Carell, Catherine Keener, Paul Rudd, Seth Rogen, Romany Malco, Elizabeth Banks

The Flowers of St. Francis

April 24, 2010

An experimental neo-realist film, not so much a biopic as a pictorial devotional to the titular medieval saint. Rossellini divides his Flowers of St. Francis into twelve vignettes showcasing the personal and spiritual milestones in the life of the titular ascetic. Rossellini’s use of non-professional actors (except for the appropriately scene-chewing Fabrizi) and a stripped-down technique succeed in creating the impression that the director and his cameraman traveled back to early 13th century Italy and gathered this luminous record. The result is simple, unpretentious, and an uncannily evocative portrait–emotionally moving, even funny, without overplaying its hand. In that sense, Rossellini stays true to his neo-realist principles and to his unconditionally humble subject. With his warm, welcoming, unassuming presence, Gerardi does the example of St. Francis proud in this, one of the cinema’s loveliest spiritual explorations.

Grade: A-

Directed by: Roberto Rossellini
Screenplay by: Federico Fellini, Father Antonio Lisandrini, Father Félix Morión, Roberto Rossellini
Cast: Aldo Fabrizi, Brother Nazario Gerardi, Arabella Lemaitre

Fitzcarraldo

April 24, 2010

Herzog’s masterfully poetic study in obsession marshals the forces of cinematic tone to their fullest. An eccentric entrepreneur and budding opera impresario (the mad and magnetic Klaus Kinski) determines to build an opera house in his backwater Amazonian settlement in the late-19th century. To do so, he buys a region abutting an Amazon tributary where he can cultivate rubber plants so that he can profit from the rubber boom and, hence, amass the funds to build his dream house, with Enrique Caruso there to inaugurate it! Klaus Kinski is flat-out mesmerizing–a madman playing a madman. The redolence and lushness of the Amazon is richly evoked. There are moments here you’ll never see on-screen anywhere else–only here do you get to see a massive steamboat getting hauled up a mountainside by Amazonian tribals working winches while Herzog’s monomaniac hero serenades the jungle with his recordings of Caruso on a phonograph perched atop the boat. Awesome, hypnotic storytelling, Fitzcarraldo finds this director working in top form.

Grade: A

Directed by: Werner Herzog
Screenplay by: Werner Herzog
Cast: Klaus Kinski, Claudia Cardinale, José Lewgoy, Miguel Ángel Fuentes, Paul Hittscher

Fire

April 24, 2010

Domestic upheaval ensues in Deepa Mehta’s Fire after Radha (Azmi), an emotionally repressed housewife caged in a traditional Indian household, falls for Sita (Das), her sprightly young sister-in-law. Both women find themselves victims of a tradition-bound society, one that lends unquestioned impunity to its males no matter how oppressive or unfair their behavior. In Radha’s case, it means living out her life in abject and sexless servitude to her husband, Ashok (Kharbanda)–a born-again Hindu of sorts, devoted to his swami and to the rigors of his draconian moralism and self-imposed celibacy. Still just a young bride, Sita chafes at her role of the meek wife to Jatin (Jaffrey), a two-timer, torn between what is expected of him–namely to get married while young and bear children–and his own adoration of his Chinese mistress, Alice. While Jatin’s story is given short shrift and his characterization borders on the buffoonish as does Ashok’s, whose uptight appeals to “duty” and “control” cohere into a caricature of the hidebound Hindu, Mehta’s script shines when focusing on Sita and Radha. This is their story after all and Mehta’s approach to them feels tender and honest as the women discover their love and desire for each desire. Fire’s attitude to lesbianism–a theme that drew ire among India’s fundamentalists at the time of its release–is tasteful, reined-in without feeling restrained. After the secrecy of their affair is threatened, Mehta follows Radha and Sita’s journey towards liberation with a steady, sure eye. While she leaves Jatin’s storyline dangling, her resolution to the women’s ordeal feels compassionate and realistic. It gets us angry, frustrated, and in awe of all those among us who dare to break free of the bonds that enslave. In that and through its tight ensemble of terrific performances (particularly its two luminous leads) Fire lights its spark beautifully. This is the first part in Mehta’s Trilogy of the Elements whose subsequent installments are Earth and Water.

Grade: B

Directed by: Deepa Mehta
Screenplay: Deepa Mehta
Cast: Nandita Das, Shabana Azmi, Ranjit Chowdhry, Javed Jaffrey, Kushal Rekhi, Khulbhushan Kharbanda, Alice Poon


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 481 other followers