Archive for the ‘Romance’ Category

Two English Girls

September 7, 2010

Two English Girls is widely regarded as one of Truffaut’s masterpieces. Likewise, let it be known that, once again, the critical response to this film is wildly out of proportion to the merits of the film itself. Truffaut is, without doubt, the most vain of the French New Wave filmmakers, a moral delinquent/movie-loving savant whose charms hoodwinked many into believing he had the humility and inner complexity to be a great storyteller. Watch anything made by India’s Satyajit Ray made between 1955 and 1975 if you want stories told by a true genius, one whose studies of love and yearning would easily put this French brat — for that matter, just about any one making movies on the world stage at that time — to shame.

Jean-Pierre Léaud, for all his appeal, is just a blank-faced mannequin standing in for the morally disingenuous and superficial exploits of Truffaut himself. To him, as ever, humans are too capricious, too much at the whims of physical love for anything lasting and meaningful. This is a fine and powerful message if Truffaut himself didn’t give it the romanticized credence that he does time and again in each of his silly, nonsensical (not to mention overrated) outings.

Why is it that Truffaut’s stories are generally so well received, considering that his characters’ exhibit little or no inner contradictions and complexities? For a viewer to sympathize with a character, that character has, at some point, to acknowledge regret, to have suffered, or compromised because of a single-minded devotion to something or someone greater than him- or herself, to express a humbling sense of purpose. Léaud’s characters exhibit nothing of this sort — they are lost, easily distracted and undisciplined, all the qualities you might readily disdain in a character, except for the fact that Truffaut chooses to make him a chick magnet who loves and leaves with no discernible feeling and with utter impunity. It’s part of what makes Truffaut’s cinema so woefully shallow, so unequal to the task of reaching a better understanding of human beings.

Also, I can’t stand flat, vapid cinematography, especially when it’s coupled with flat, vapid characters and story material. Nestor Almendros is famed for using natural light and unpretentious compositions and his aesthetic was very much in vogue in the European cinema of the early ’70s. The problem is that a filmmaker needs to enmesh this anti-glamorous style with an absolutely uncompromised dramaturgy. Truffaut, though, just wants to get laid, so to speak, to strive for anything deeper and more complex than Léaud’s high jinks.

Still, Georges Delerue’s lovely score and fine performances by Markham and Tendeter keep another one of Truffaut’s narcissistic escapades–masquerading as “high brow” and “literate” cinema–watchable, but just barely.

Grade: C+

Directed by: François Truffaut
Written by: François Truffaut, Jean Gruault
Cast: Jean-Pierre Léaud, Kika Markham, Stacey Tendeter, Sylvia Marriott, Marie Mansart

Stolen Kisses

September 3, 2010

Typically light fare from the master of French Lite, Francois Truffaut. Many have hailed this movie as a masterful and poignant treatment of “young love.” It is not. It’s just a story about an inept goofball, struggling to make a go of it at various professions while failing to make an emotional commitment with a young woman. Jean-Pierre Laud is such a charismatic and charming presence on-screen that he alone can make us forgive the moral leeway and comic indulgences that Truffaut perpetrates. Antoine Doinel — and I realize he’s Truffaut’s alter ego — frequents prostitutes and has never met a woman whose sexual advances he’s refused — including the attractive socialite-wife of his shoe store employer. He’s just your typically shy, lonely and charmingly self-effacing misfit — the kind the women, if you live in Truffaut’s world especially, love to pursue.

So where’s the sense of struggle and compromise here? Everything is hunky-dory in Truffaut’s Paris — a city without darkness, true despair and suffering, all of which we need an unstinting dash of in order for a story and a character of any worth to truly develop. Still, this is fun fluffy stuff. Of all the French filmmakers of this era, Truffaut is the one who truly offends me. He’s far too full of himself for any humility to shine through in his work. Everything feels false, a pretense, existing either as an “homage to Hollywood” genres (something that really irks me about the French New Wave) or as dippy, maudlin romantic nonsense, all in the service of Truffaut’s narcissism.

Grade: B-

Directed by: François Truffaut
Written by: François Truffaut, Claude de Givray, Bernard Revon
Cast: Jean-Pierre Léaud, Delphine Seyrig, Claude Jade, Michael Lonsdale, Catherine Lutz

The Switch

August 20, 2010

Characters in the new Jennifer Aniston-Jason Bateman rom-com “The Switch” talk a lot about throwing one another a “curve ball.” Ironic since “The Switch” is about as down the middle as movies can get; so unimaginative and formula-driven is this movie that it seems entirely to have been hashed out by executives over a long lunch. And so limp and halting is its storytelling that we get the sense that we’re watching only the rough cut.

Neurotic, New York City stock trader Wally (Bateman) is best friend to bright, sexy, perennially single TV producer Kassie (Aniston). Afraid of change, Wally’s content with their platonic relationship until Kassie reveals she wants a child and that, in fact, she’s found the prefect sperm donor in Roland (Patrick Wilson, flashing megawatt smiles left and right). Wally’s pent-up feelings over Kassie and her decision sends him into a tailspin at her “insemination party” where, drunk and high, he bungles Roland’s cup of precious “ingredient” and replaces it with his own. Soon after, Kassie gets pregnant and moves back to Minnesota to raise her kid.

That seven years pass and never do these alleged “best friends” see other once is a stretch but we buy it because it’s the only way writer Allan Loeb and directors Josh Gordon and Will Speck’s central gimmick can work. And that gimmick is the shock that registers on Wally upon first meeting Kassie’s son Sebastian (Thomas Robinson): the boy’s hangdog expression, the moodiness, the neuroses they both share leave little doubt whose son he could be.

Wally and Sebastian warm to each other over several “bonding” scenes, some tepid, others amusing. The question now for Wally is how to reveal to Kassie that he’s Wally’s father, not the strapping Roland who, by the way, re-enters the story as Kassie’s new love interest. As she and Roland begin a serious courtship, one that threatens marriage, Wally finds himself under pressure to pour his heart out to Kassie – tell her the truth about Sebastian and his own long-suppressed love for her.

The problem is not that you saw it all coming before the movie even started, but that “The Switch” makes so little effort to surprise us, to deviate just a tad from genre protocol. The characters are assembly-line widgets: Besides the above-mentioned, we have Leonard (Jeff Goldblum), Wally’s business partner and confidante, and Debbie (Juliette Lewis), Kassie’s kooky sidekick. From what we get of Debbie, she’s not the sharpest tool in the shed, and Kassie’s friendship with her exists solely to provide a comic foil to Kassie’s earthy pragmatism. Likewise, Leonard, who’s just Wally’s sounding board and therapist stand-in as it offers Goldblum an another role to ply his glib, vaguely patronizing gadfly shtick.

As the reigning queen of B-grade rom-coms, Aniston is cannily appealing, her attractiveness tailored to perfection. For his part, Bateman’s warm, genuine presence can make even pabulum like “The Switch” worth a look, even just for his moments – both comedic and dramatic, all wholly original. As proof, I submit a scene involving a hung over Wally, a lobby trashcan and an unwitting passerby. It’s laugh-out-loud funny, and point to how deserving the actor is of better, bolder material.

Grade: C

Directed by: Josh Gordon & Will Speck
Written by: Allan Loeb
Cast: Jason Bateman, Jennifer Aniston, Thomas Robinson, Jeff Goldblum, Juliette Lewis, Patrick Wilson

Soul Kitchen

August 19, 2010

German filmmaker Fatih Akin, noted for award-winning dramas like “The Edge of Heaven,” takes a stab at comedy and romance with “Soul Kitchen,” an experiment in lunacy and laughs for Akin but an endurance test for the rest of us. Lacking character development and clean story construction, Akin’s film subsists on antic set pieces that try to wring laughs but come up dry.

The title refers to the comfort-food restaurant owned by the oafish Zinos (Adam Bousdoukos, who co-wrote the script with director Akin). With his journalist girlfriend Nadine (Pheline Roggan) on assignment in Shanghai, Zinos throws out his back while attempting to lug around a dishwasher in his restaurant kitchen. Too injured to cook, he hires a passionate but ill-tempered chef, Shayn (Birol Ünel), but his sophisticated concoctions turn away the restaurant’s regulars. Meanwhile, Zinos’ convict brother Illias (Moritz Bleibtreu) weasels his way onto the wait staff so that he can get extended parole. Tensions mount when both tax and health inspectors show up with ultimatums, and the cutthroat realtor Neumann (Wotan Wilke Möhring) turns up the heat on Zinos to sell his restaurant

While Zinos and Nadine’s relationship goes the way of the Skype end-call button, Illias falls hard for Soul Kitchen’s sexy waitress Lucia (Anna Bederke). As word of the restaurant spreads to area hipsters, business starts to boom and so do the dance beats as Soul Kitchen takes off as a culinary and nightclub hangout. Akin saturates the soundtrack with the obligatory soul, funk and hip-hop for no good reason except to justify the film’s title, and to punctuate his themes of youth, fun and freedom. Zinos himself demonstrates no special connection with music or, for that matter, with cooking or running a restaurant.

Endless scenes of young people partying float along on semi-clever gags and generic good cheer, and do nothing to punch up the plot or enrich the central characters. As the object of Illias’ attraction, Lucia is a stock bohemian: She’s got the sullen pout, the exotic dance moves and the cigarette dangling from her lips. Both she, with her frumpy rebelliousness, and the waiter Lutz (Lucas Gergorowicz), who’s a garage band musician with a rock ‘n’ roll attitude, represent not characters but ideas for characters. Then there’s the unamusing curmudgeon Sokrates (Demir Gökgöl), a freeloading tenant of sorts in Zinos’ building. He’s a contemptible fly-on-the-wall type, hovering in the background, amounting to nothing. Indeed, Akin’s entire roll call of characters is comprised of ciphers and social clichés.

Blame “Soul Kitchen’s” script for the mess. Every joke, sentiment and set piece (one involving a Honduran aphrodisiac has predictably raunchy results) strains for effect, each falling flat. Zinos comes off as a clueless tool in whom we invest our total indifference, and his cohorts are largely throwaways forgotten no sooner than we leave our seats. Structurally, the script tangles together multiple strands, as the personal and professional pieces of Zinos’ life smash together, and it hasn’t a clue how to take its characters through the requisite beats of what is allegedly a story about a man’s search for self. Just as “Soul Kitchen” is allegedly an attempt at bright, witty comedy.

Grade: D

Directed by: Fatih Akin
Written by: Fatih Akin, Adam Bousdoukos
Cast: Adam Bousdoukos, Mortiz Bleibtreu, Birol Ünel, Anna Bederke, Pheline Roggan, Lukas Gregorowicz, Dorka Gryllus, Wotan Wilke Möhring, Demir Gökgöl

Hiroshima, Mon Amour

August 16, 2010

Hiroshima, Mon Amour, Alain Resnais’ meditation on memory and how one can never escape or forget the past, follows a French actress who travels to Hiroshima to shoot a movie. She meets a Japanese architect and the two have a romantic fling. They have great chemistry together but both know they can never leave their families, nor have they any inclination to do so. The more time they spend together in the shadow of a horrific war, the more the woman is reminded of her first great love–a German soldier with whom she had a passionate affair during the Occupation. What really got me about this movie were Resnais’ incredible editing, conflating past and present; Michio Takahashi and Sacha Vierny’s gorgeous photography; and Georges Delerue and Giovanni Fusco’s haunting, lonely music score. Their music is a presence unto itself. Though made in the late 50s, Hiroshima’s imagery and music give it a feel at once modern and timeless, this is a beautiful piece of work.

Grade: A-

Directed by: Alain Resnais
Screenplay by: Marguerite Duras
Cast: Emmanuelle Riva, Eiji Okada, Stella Dassas, Pierre Barbaud

Happy Together

April 29, 2010

How does Wong Kar Wai do it? He has this preternatural gift for film style–few modern filmmakers have his graceful command of the medium in conjuring moods and emotions. Happy Together is an incredible example of that gift, telling the story of two gay expatriate lovers who’ve left Hong Kong for a sojourn in Buenos Aires. One of them gets a job at a restaurant while the other lays about the boarding house where they’ve shacked up.

They break up and get back together again. Their bliss is short-lived, though, because jealousies soon creep in and they’re right back to where they started from before they realize that they need to seek their destinies separately. There isn’t much to it. The power, though, of this movie is all in Wan Kar-Wai’s imagemaking–he begins with gritty black-and-white then slowly saturates the movie with pulpy colors as the characters’ relationship evolves. The best term that I can think of for this movie’s style is “Vérité Chic”–it uses this jostling “guerilla” technique but the cinematographer Christopher Doyle, the genius that he is, tricks out the images with filters and does very innovative things that I can’t begin to understand, all of which lend Happy Together this subtle but undeniable sense of yearning.

While Argentina’s landscape and culture lend the movie its authenticity, its sense of place, it never becomes travelogue-ish. Rather, the vitality of Buenos Aires is shot so expressively that it augments the movie’s youthful themes. This is all-around fabulous work that deservedly won Wong a Best Director prize at the 1997 Cannes Film Festival.

Grade: A-

Directed by: Wong Kar Wai
Written by: Wong Kar Wai
Cast: Leslie Cheung, Tony Leung, Chen Chang, Gregory Dayton

The Girl on the Bridge

April 25, 2010

An incredibly odd little romance on fairly conventional lines: boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy gets girl, but all of it done up with a bizarre sense of tone that makes it well worth the ride. The Girl on the Bridge is like a hybrid of Chaplin and David Lynch but not profound enough to measure up to the former and not dark and odd enough for the latter. Still, Patrice Laconte achieves something so unusual–a kind of magical realism in black-and-white–that you can’t help but keep watching: The movie is about a suicidally depressed young waif (Vanessa Paradis) who’s really a pushover for a pickup line and for age-old notions about romantic love. She takes up with a knife-thrower (the always-splendid Daniel Auteuil) and together they set off from one circus gig to another. Their relationship is charged, sexually, though they don’t even so much as kiss during the entire film. The metaphor of the knife-throwing as sex act, one that combines impulses of fear and trust into an erotic experience, is remarkable, especially due to Paradis’ most convincing show of swooning against the boards. Leconte’s humor is whacky, sometimes surreal, and his assured direction yields delightfully seriocomic performances. I do wish the script had taken more chances, especially with regard to Auteuil’s character (to make him, say, even more emotionally distant), but Girl is still an oddly amusing and touching work.

Grade: B

Directed by: Patrice Leconte
Screenplay by: Serge Frydman
Cast: Vanessa Paradis, Daniel Auteuil, Frédéric Pfluger, Demetre Georgalas

Garden State

April 25, 2010

Garden State is about as good “indie” cinema gets these days. I use the term “indie” to mean those movies not financed by the big-budget divisions of the majors. It’s basically a superfluous term now unless you’re talking about a boldly personal, political, or aesthetic mission on the part of an artist working well outside the mainstream.

“Indie” movies, then, now lie squarely in the realm of the mediocre-but-watchable. Twenty-something filmmakers/writers/artists assaying difficult life topics as their subjects generally misfire with awfully precious, immature and false work. They ought to stick to material like Rush Hour and American Pie sequels–thematically easy-to-digest material that they can handle. The new generation of American filmmakers might be enthusiastic (you can’t make movies otherwise), but they have absolutely no sense of daring, originality or flair for the medium the way Cassavetes and his generation did. What is Tarantino, for instance, but a pasticheur who lifts entire ideas from other filmmakers who did it better the first time. To his credit, Tarantino has never tried to be a poet of the soul, never aspired to such a thing because he doesn’t have a soulful idea in him, and he knows it. So he wisely sticks to torturously contrived executions of secondhand material (with the exception, let me point out, of his lovely Jackie Brown).

Back to Garden State: This tepid comedy-drama about the unlikely love that blooms between a neurotic actor and a giggly, vivacious Jersey girl has enough moments of sweetness and truth to redeem its indie pretensions. The movie was directed by its star, Zach Braff, a TV actor, and, as such, has absolutely no cinematic signature. Braff’s staging is flat and he relies readily on smooth, arcing boom shots that feel out-of-place in material that purports to be so grounded in life’s simplicities.

A few good moments and spot-on dialogue save Garden State from hip du jour oblivion. Then again, the same can be said for 99 percent of the so-called “indie cinema” of the past fifteen years. Just because a filmmaker espouses the ideals of homegrown, anti-Hollywood cinema means nothing: There’s still the small matter of having something truthful to convey and, more than that, the cinematic chops and the poet’s soul to give it form. The same goes for all the Sundancey titles like that indie lump of cheese whiz, The Station Agent. Take it away before I throw up, and pass me my copy of Rush Hour.

Another huge gripe with Braff’s movie: What’s with the wall-to-wall, almost whorish, adherence to the indie-pop soundtrack? If he weren’t busy posturing as a storyteller, Braff would do well to sign on as a shill for The Shins and spare the rest of us the brunt of his filmmaking ambitions.

Is specious dreck like this the best that indie cinema can come up with nowadays, in its desperate flailing for something quirky, honest? Garden State, All the Real Girls, Donnie Darko. If not such overcooked trifle, we get the bloated inanities from film brat like P.T. Anderson who thinks he’s doing something Important. My advice to them and filmmakers of that ilk who would commit stories to celluloid: Follow Christopher Nolan’s lead and stick to Hollywood factory filmmaking. Hone your craft and resist attempts at “personal” filmmaking.

It almost seems that modern American culture, with its incessant and pervasive big media influences, has bled the “individuality” out of its popular arts. We don’t experience our own lives anymore so much as draw on lives and values absorbed from advertising, TV, and movies. The last two generations have been saturated with values of consumerism and paranoia at the absence of individual creative development–a group cultural phenomenon I like to call zombification. Garden State, with its bland and desperate humor, is symptomatic of zombification, and, as sad as it sounds, the quintessential product by and for uninspired times.

Grade: C

Directed by: Zach Braff
Witten by: Zach Braff
Cast: Zach Braff, Natalie Portman, Peter Sarsgaard, Jean Smart, Ann Dowd, Alex Burns

Fire

April 24, 2010

Domestic upheaval ensues in Deepa Mehta’s Fire after Radha (Azmi), an emotionally repressed housewife caged in a traditional Indian household, falls for Sita (Das), her sprightly young sister-in-law. Both women find themselves victims of a tradition-bound society, one that lends unquestioned impunity to its males no matter how oppressive or unfair their behavior. In Radha’s case, it means living out her life in abject and sexless servitude to her husband, Ashok (Kharbanda)–a born-again Hindu of sorts, devoted to his swami and to the rigors of his draconian moralism and self-imposed celibacy. Still just a young bride, Sita chafes at her role of the meek wife to Jatin (Jaffrey), a two-timer, torn between what is expected of him–namely to get married while young and bear children–and his own adoration of his Chinese mistress, Alice. While Jatin’s story is given short shrift and his characterization borders on the buffoonish as does Ashok’s, whose uptight appeals to “duty” and “control” cohere into a caricature of the hidebound Hindu, Mehta’s script shines when focusing on Sita and Radha. This is their story after all and Mehta’s approach to them feels tender and honest as the women discover their love and desire for each desire. Fire’s attitude to lesbianism–a theme that drew ire among India’s fundamentalists at the time of its release–is tasteful, reined-in without feeling restrained. After the secrecy of their affair is threatened, Mehta follows Radha and Sita’s journey towards liberation with a steady, sure eye. While she leaves Jatin’s storyline dangling, her resolution to the women’s ordeal feels compassionate and realistic. It gets us angry, frustrated, and in awe of all those among us who dare to break free of the bonds that enslave. In that and through its tight ensemble of terrific performances (particularly its two luminous leads) Fire lights its spark beautifully. This is the first part in Mehta’s Trilogy of the Elements whose subsequent installments are Earth and Water.

Grade: B

Directed by: Deepa Mehta
Screenplay: Deepa Mehta
Cast: Nandita Das, Shabana Azmi, Ranjit Chowdhry, Javed Jaffrey, Kushal Rekhi, Khulbhushan Kharbanda, Alice Poon

Doctor Zhivago

April 16, 2010

As a love story, Zhivago is pretty weak: The two lovers (played by Sharif and Christie) are not convincing in conveying passionate and irrepressible desire. What’s more, David Lean is not a poet of the heart; his depiction of lovers is sophomoric (Summertime might his best handling of that theme).

What he can do, however, and where his genius lies is in making the screen come alive with precise physical detail. His recreation of Bolshevik-era Russia is magnificent: it feels astonishingly real, like the screen itself might’ve frozen over around the edges if the shot held a second longer. Beautiful cinematography by Freddie Young and set design by John Box, together with excellent performances combine to form Zhivago’s timeless appeal–this, as far as I know, is Omar Shariff’s best remembered role; Julie Christie, so sensuous and demure at once, can make a guy break out in a sweat; and Rod Steiger as a cad who becomes the lovers’ dubious benefactor is terrific. An entertaining saga, though not wholly convincing and involving.

Grade: A-

Directed by: David Lean
Screenplay by: Robert Bolt
Cast: Omar Sharif, Julie Christie, Geraldine Chaplin, Rod Steiger, Alec Guinness


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.