Archive for the ‘Science Fiction’ Category

Moon

November 9, 2012

Talk about curveballs. What begins as a self-searching meditation on loneliness, set on a lunar mining station in the near-future, becomes a Twilight Zone-esque, down-the-rabbit-hole inquiry into identity, madness, and the validity of one’s memories. Sam Rockwell plays Sam, a miner sent to the moon by an energy company specializing in extracting a lunar mineral that ends up solving Earth’s energy crisis.

At the end of a solo, three-year stint, Sam is desperately homesick, eager to see his wife (Dominique McElligott) and daughter again, and give life on Earth another shot after a track record marred presumably by dangerous mood swings. His only companion on the lunar station is GERTY, a robot voiced by Kevin Spacey, and one of Moon’s slyest and most amusing offerings. Equipped with a full range of emotional and verbal abilities, it’s odd that GERTY expresses moods by way of smiley-face/sad-face emoticons that appear on a tiny screen. Add to that Spacey’s gift for the half-genuine, half-sarcastic line reading, and you’ve got one of the screen’s most memorable computer characters since HAL 9000.

It’s in the second half of Moon that GERTY’s motives become suspect. After Sam survives a mining accident, strange things begin to happen. Chief among them, he finds himself sharing the station with his doppelganger, who mysteriously appears as Sam awakens from his trauma. Also calling himself Sam, this twin is just as perplexed as the original Sam at the presence of the other. Both Sams share the same memories, the same hopes, dreams, and goals. What the two can agree on is that GERTY is hiding something. And, in spite of their mistrust of each other, team up to uncover the truth behind who they are and why they’re here.

The star of the show, of course, is Rockwell who bifurcates Sam into two wholly compelling characters, both different shades of the same persona. The more you consider his performance, the more its brilliance and complexity dawns on you. Rockwell brings his trademark quirkiness and snark to both Sams, but his style is tempered by a guilelessness on the one hand and a tough-guy bravado on the other so that we see competing ranges of color coalescing into a pleasing buddy-movie dynamic that’s alternately comedic and poignant. Intriguing, imaginative, and thematically ambitious, Moon gives ample proof that Jones is a serious talent, pushing his concepts into intellectually and spiritually challenging territory.

Grade: B+

Directed by: Duncan Jones
Written by: Duncan Jones, Nathan Parker
Starring: Sam Rockwell, Kevin Spacey, Dominique McElligott

Chronicle

February 13, 2012

Three high schoolers stumble onto a sinkhole in the middle of a field. They descend into it and encounter a mysterious, supposedly alien force that imparts each of them with superpowers in director Josh Trank’s debut feature, Chronicle. Employing the by-now familiar, low-budget artifice of “home video” footage (made famous by The Blair Witch Project on through Cloverfield and the Paranormal Activity series, to name a few), Trank follows the boys’ exhilarating discovery of their telekinetic abilities, beginning with the playing of harmless pranks and culminating in the near-destruction of Seattle.

Chronicle is positioned as a superhero origin story as the teenagers — happy-go-lucky jock Steve (Michael B. Jordan), charming misfit Matt (Alex Garetty) and disturbed loner Andrew (Dane DeHaan) — must contend with whether and how to use their powers. While Steve and Matt are content to limit the use of their abilities for the mere pursuit of fun, Andrew veers off-course and begins a downward spiral into criminality. Andrew’s choice isn’t surprising; as a victim of abuse, a son of an alcoholic father and an ailing mother, it’s only natural that his mind would steer towards revenge and mayhem. That forces the iconoclast Matt into the role of superhero, something he wants nothing to do with, but he’s all that the world has in terms of a defense against Andrew’s armageddon-scale abilities. So, in that sense, we have the creation of the classic Marvel Comics dynamic of the unwilling superhero (in the Peter Parker/Spider-Man mold) against the psychologically damaged arch-villain).

As always in the case of first-person, home video-style movies, the artifice gets in the way of the action. That characters would tote along a camera and have the presence of mind to shoot video while in the midst of wildly traumatic or ecstatic events (whether being chased through the woods by a witch, intruded upon in the middle of the night by a demon, invaded by an alien monster or, in the case of Chronicle, discovering that you have the ability to fly) is simply ridiculous. It’s an artifice that appeals because of its approximation to cable news, YouTube and home videos — things that are as much a part of our lives as the laptop I’m writing on or the tea I’m drinking. The merging of the familiar with the supernatural or the uncanny is what viewers find so irresistible (including me). But when the action ramps up, the artifice reveals itself to be the clumsy gimmick that it is. And it doesn’t fare any better here than it did in the case of its predecessors. While we’re on the subject, Chronicle breaks its own rule by frequently shifting to a smoother, objective visual style when the need arises, thereby wanting the best of both worlds. We only see it, though, as cheating.

That said, Chronicle is an enjoyable spin through the tropes of the superhero origin story. And it takes time to develop its characters richly, Andrew in particular. DeHaan nicely modulates Andrew’s sweet, soft-hearted interior in the movie’s first half with the hardening, monstrous anger that takes over in the second half. And while Russell’s Matt is a somewhat hazier, less sure-footed characterization, we can get behind any character with a dimpled smile who can quote Jung and use the word “hubris” in conversation.

Predictably, Chronicle unravels into forgettable mayhem in its third act as Andrew takes out his pent-up rage on Seattle leading to an Andrew-Matt showdown. Yet the movie’s first half contain enough unique moments to prove that Trank and screenwriter Max Landis have more than spectacle in mind. The scenes in which the boys first try out their powers come off best. Trank maintains a low-key, open-eyed curiosity throughout these scenes and a childlike sense of wonder prevails, most memorably in the “I-can-fly” sequence, which unlocks a primal sort of exhilaration in the viewer to match that of the characters. Moments like these demonstrate perhaps the most effective use of the home video style since “The Blair Witch Project,” anchoring their characters’ (and our) shock and surprise at the supernatural in the background of the familiar.

Grade: B-

Directed by: Josh Trank
Written by: Max Landis
Cast: Dane DeHaan, Alex Russell, Michael B. Jordan, Michael Kelly, Ashley Hinshaw, Anna Wood, Bo Petersen

Code 46

January 22, 2012

A futuristic film noir-love story with an Oedipal twist. That sounds like a devilish cocktail and it might’ve made for just such a movie. But “Code 46” by director Michael Winterbottom and writer Frank Cottrell Boyce is a muddy, strangely unintoxicating mix. A noir with no moral desperation, no clear-cut point-of-view and a love story whose eroticism feels about as urgent as yardwork.

This is not to say that “Code 46” lacks merit. Mark Tildesley’s production design and Alwin Kuchler and Marcel Zyskind’s photography ingeniously render a future-world that has ingredients of “Blade Runner” and “Mad Max” among other futuristic noir antecedents. Its soaring neon-lit towers and its smog- and dust-enshrouded landscapes are striking, but equally so is how the movie’s design—out of a need for economy and narrative expediency—is kept within the bounds of a recognizable reality. Those gleaming and ominous settings are modern-day Shanghai, Dubai and Hong Kong tricked out merely with lighting, filters and minimal art design.

Winterbottom and Cottrell Boyce postulate an endpoint to our age of rapid urbanizing and globalizing. Theirs is a George Orwell-meets- Phillip K. Dick dystopia where people’s mobility and behavior are heavily regulated and where overpopulated cities are separated by vast stretches of wasteland. “Code 46” itself refers to a reproductive law in which partners who share common genes are prohibited from mating—a way to keep genetically identical humans and clones from getting it on.

There’s the rub for William (Tim Robbins), a detective who arrives in Shanghai to track down who’s been manufacturing and selling counterfeit “papelles”— special permits needed to transit from one city to another. The culprit, he discovers, is Maria (Samantha Morton), a waifish, dreamy-eyed loner. He promptly falls in love and into bed with her. Soon after returning to his married life, William is alerted to a murder that leads him back to Maria. But her memory of William, their shared sexual history, has since been wiped clean by doctors, owing to a Code 46 violation. William learns that Maria was cloned from his own mother’s genes. Logically, I wondered why, if sex with such a clone were possible, aren’t there measures—identity cards, retinal scans, whatever—to preempt such an act. Why? Because logic would’ve overstepped “Code 46’s” entire second half when William, too smitten with Maria to care about their genetic relatedness, flies off with her for another illicit jaunt in the desert. Their cavorting, of course, comes to the lovelorn end we expect from this genre, but which registers none of its emotional payoff.

Tim Robbins and Samantha Morton, two intelligent actors, are fatally unconvincing as lovers. As William proceeds to woo Maria, we continually wonder what he sees in her and vice versa. Sporting her close-cropped “In America” haircut, Morton pitches her performance somewhere between the crime-predicting humanoid of “Minority Report” and the mute wallflower of “Sweet and Lowdown”—not exactly a combination to get a man’s pulse racing. The foundation for all noirs is how it reveals a wounded world through the dark but ever-hopeful gaze of its detective-protagonists. “Code 46,” which poises itself as noir, fails utterly to lock us into William’s world-view; Winterbottom, instead, lingers on Maria’s pseudo-poetic interior monologues, conjuring dreamy moments that narratively amount to nothing. Below William’s cocksure surface, Robbins’ characterization is a milky mess, absent of any motive for his infidelity, let alone a personal desire to solve this or any crime.

“Code 46” is an ambitious but miscalculated affair, owing entirely to Cottrell Boyce’s unengaging script. It prompts more questions of logic and motivation than it bargained for, losing its actors and audience along the way. Winterbottom is a competent filmmaker known also for his prolific output. Were it not for his flair for mood and texture, “Code 46” might sink entirely. Nevertheless, he might better serve his stories—especially those as conceptually complex as this one—by slowing down and taking the time to tell them clearly and well.

Grade: C

Directed by: Michael Winterbottom
Written by: Frank Cottrell Boyce
Cast: Tim Robbins, Samantha Morton, Om Puri

Resident Evil: Afterlife

September 14, 2010

Producer-director-writer Paul W.S. Anderson’s unstoppable spinoffs of “Resident Evil,” the megahit humans vs. zombies video-game franchise, continues with “Resident Evil: Afterlife.” It offers the full grab bag of “Matrix”-y effects thrown at your eyeballs over and over again accompanied by a head-pounding fusion of hard rock and techno. In fact, during many scenes in “Afterlife,” I wasn’t sure whether to watch Milla Jovovich do leaps and somersaults in slo-mo while firing bullets and bathed in droplets of rain, or just get up and dance to the soundtrack.

Unsurprisingly, “Afterlife” is being released in both 2D and 3D versions; I saw the 3D, which adds nothing qualitatively to the experience. While if offers some genuinely clever touches initially, “Afterlife” loses steam once Anderson becomes less interested in the story at hand and more on wrapping it up, making sure to set up another sequel.

In terms of visual design, the movie’s opening set inside the expansively futuristic headquarters of the evil Umbrella Corporation (the company that perpetrated the zombie virus) impresses most. Here, Alice (Milla Jovovich), a human with all the emotional register of a mannequin, confronts the company’s CEO, Albert Wesker (Shawn Roberts) – he’s the one sporting the shades and the bad Brit accent – in a no-holds-barred battle that begins indoors and ends in a plane crash from which Alice escapes. Thereafter, the bulk of “Afterlife” follows Alice and cohort Claire’s (Ali Larter) attempts to lead a group of survivors, holed up in a high-rise L.A. prison, to a tanker ship believed to be a safe haven from zombies, just offshore. The sections inside the prison work best as the survivors – ranging from the rangy, Will Smith-esque ex-basketball player Luther West (Boris Kodjoe) to the reptilian movie producer, Bennett (Kim Coates). Anderson, thankfully, slows the story enough to take advantage of his premise’s horror-movie and survivalist drama tropes as issues of betrayal, trust and camaraderie boil to the surface, and suspicions arise that the zombies may be tunneling their way in.

Once the zombies overrun the prison, “Afterlife” switches to action-movie gear from which it never returns, culminating in a finale that’s a pale rehash of the opening. The occasional flashes of imagination aside, “Afterlife” epitomizes what movies written largely by software and marketing committees look like. Diehard fans of the franchise and genre enthusiasts may flock to it, but on its own merits, the movie offers little. To say it’s nothing more than a crass merchandising gimmick would be to acknowledge Hollywood’s openly cynical attitude to story telling and the film business in general. And what’s the point of that?

Grade: C-

Directed by: Paul W. S. Anderson
Written by: Paul W. S. Anderson
Cast: Milla Jovovich, Ali Larter, Kim Coates, Shawn Roberts, Sergio Peris-Mencheta, Spencer Locke, Boris Kodjoe, Wentworth Miller, Sienna Guillory, Kacey Barnfield, Norman Yeung, Fulvio Cecere

Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith

September 3, 2010

The bar has been set so low in mainstream Hollywood movies that it’s not even worth seriously analyzing this stuff. Lucas’ franchise is a cultural event and that, more than the movie, is cause for serious worry. What can you say when a series of movies (beginning with 1999′s Phantom Menace) is this incompetently made? Lucas has a tin ear for dialogue, and he’s so grossly oblivious to issues of dramatic tension and narrative pacing that, while watching Revenge of the Sith, I just sat there benumbed to it all. The kindest thing I can say about Sith is that it’s a couple of notches better than Menace and generally watchable. It’s an orgiastic spectacle of visual effects and painterly CGI alien cityscapes in place of smart, engrossing storytelling. What’s weird is that the most emotionally resonant moments in it don’t really stem from the story itself but from how we causally connect the implications made therein with our memory of the original three Star Wars movies…sigh. Still, if this tripe works for you, so be it. For me, this (along with other recent drivel like Sin City) is another nail in the coffin for the art of storytelling in Hollywood. And, while I’m on it, it points to the degradation of intelligence in culture as a whole, both in America and in its imperial subsidiaries overseas.

Grade: C+

Directed by: George Lucas
Written by: George Lucas
Cast: Ewan McGregor, Natalie Portman, Hayden Christensen, Ian McDiarmid, Samuel L. Jackson, Jimmy Smits, Frank Oz, Anthony Daniels, Christopher Lee, Keisha Castle-Hughes

Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow

September 3, 2010

Visually, this one’s just pure joy–a revisionist throwback to ’30s Buck Rogers-style adventure serials. I think Sky Captain tanked at the box office because it may have been too obscure in its source material for younger audiences to relate to — too demanding of the mall rats not used to its old timey cultural references. At heart, this is a classic quest story about the titular aviator-hero who, along with his sidekick, Polly Perkins — your standard go-getter reporter — go on the hunt for a German doomsday scientist who’s been building and deploying giant robots to wreak havoc around the world. The method to this scientist’s madness boils down to a spectacular finale in which his “World of Tomorrow”–a kind of intergalactic Noah’s Ark–takes to space with the aim of destroying the Earth in its wake.

The cast is fun: Gwyneth Paltrow’s Polly Perkins is pitch-perfect in the manner of all these intrepid comic book heroines; Angelina Jolie as Sky Captain’s sultry, eyepatch-wearing “Girl Friday” is delicious. Jude Law is smooth enough as Sky Captain though his aviator is no Indiana Jones. Law’s slick-haired Sky Captain is closer to Stephen Collin’s leather-jacketed, cigar-chomping flyboy from TV’s Tales of the Gold Monkey from the mid-80s.

The script’s character development is weak with Conran’s creations lacking edge and depth. This explains why the film leaves precious little residue in one’s mind when it’s over. But the visuals are phenomenal, rendered with so much love and passion that each frame is a marvel just to behold. Beautifully shot and edited and with production design that I can’t gush enough about–delivering on all levels, going from H.G. Wells to old cliffhanger serials (a la Raiders of the Lost Ark) and King Kong/Mysterious Island territory. It’s a hell of a package–I only wish it had been tied up with stronger character-driven themes and that Law and Paltrow had more combustible chemistry. Yet, this World is wonderful just the same.

Grade: B

Directed by: Kerry Conran
Written by: Kerry Conran
Cast: Gwyneth Paltrow, Jude Law, Angelina Jolie, Giovanni Ribisi, Michael Gambon

Primer

August 25, 2010

Interesting concept but absolutely nothing else fuels this “story” about white-collar white guys secretly inventing a time-travel device and then getting mixed up in ridiculous, confusing, vaguely noir-ish nonsense about doppelgangers, murder, and temporal distortions. It gets all its mileage from its brooding angst-filled tone but then sputters out when Caruth is required to put his story-pieces together into something coherent and meaningful. A cop-out if there ever was one: Caruth gets our attention but he can’t plug in the holes of his swiss-cheese storytelling. Then, before it peters out, it’s clear that Primer is just a gee-whiz vanity project, all surfaces–littered, as it is, with pseudo-scientific gobbledygook–and no substance.

Grade: C-

Directed by: Shane Carruth
Screenplay by: Shane Carruth
Cast: Shane Carruth, David Sullivan, Casey Gooden, Anand Upadhyaya, Carrie Crawford

War of the Worlds

August 18, 2010

War of the Worlds is so impressive in so many ways that it makes the frustration over its miserable final moments that much harder to bear. It’s as if the post-Schindler’s List Spielberg suddenly transformed in the Worlds’ final minutes into the cheesy 1989-era Spielberg of Always. What a shame considering the genius side of this director lays the groundwork for this movie. There are snippets from various Spielberg movies evoked all through War of the Worlds: It’s got the child-parent dynamic of E.T. set against the mass hysteria scenes of Close Encounters and Schindler’s List, suspense setpieces lifted straight out of Jurassic Park (The snake-like probes invading the cellar have an eerie resemblance to the raptors stalking the kitchen in Park, am I right?). But the most devastating and heart-wrenchingly brilliant aspect of Spielberg (especially since Schindler’s) has been the manner in which he humanizes violence. He’s got a masterful way of undercutting the spectacle of violence by foregrounding the real human suffering involved in the crossfire of violence. Saving Private Ryan was, in this regard, a miraculous work. Spielberg can stage a brilliantly crafted action sequence but, all the while, he will force us to ponder the human toll of the acts being committed. I am in awe of his ability to do this. It is exactly the way violence must be depicted, especially in a medium that treats violent acts so casually and amorally.

To be fair, Spielberg has never traded in mindless spectacle (with the exception of the hideous Temple of Doom installment of Indiana Jones and, to a lesser degree, 1941). For him, spectacle can only be justified when it’s from the point-of-view of a relatable and sympathetic character. In War of the Worlds, we watch as a whole community of average human beings are faced with and mercilessly destroyed by an alien legion wielding death rays. Unlike subhuman garbage like Independence Day or any in the barrage of “spectacle”-heavy alien invasion/disaster films of the last 20 years, this movie knows that spectacle in and of itself is pointless, nothing but a bludgeoning device meant to elicit some sort of submissive awe from the lemmings in the audience. Not this movie, though. Spielberg’s movie is truly character-driven, not effects-driven. Indeed, it’s actually very restrained in the latter regard. There is one scene in which a battle between the alien tripods and the missile-wielding copters and tanks is kept off-screen, just over a ridge. We only hear and see hints of it followed by the after-effects of the fight (a soldier screams into his radio–”No effect!”–and we see army vehicles come barreling back over the ridge…in flames!) This is the stuff of pure cinema! Ditto the train engulfed in flames as it hurtles across the screen in full view of a group of horrified survivors, the wreckage of the crashed airliner and the deracinated, crimson-hued landscape that Ray (played by Tom Cruise) eventually happens upon. In each scene, we are left to extrapolate what just happened–without availing of the action just perpetrated. For one thing, Ray wasn’t there to witness it, only there to witness the aftermath. And we’re left to look on with him and ponder the movie’s themes of the moral costs of violence, the preciousness of life and nature, and the need for a community to rally against forces that do not nurture such values.

One of the greatest images in movies released in my lifetime is in War of the Worlds. It takes place during the scene in which panic-stricken survivors are clambering aboard a ferry, trying to get past the barricade of soldiers keeping them at bay. Then, they hear that heart-stopping siren (that two-note baritone battle call that the alien tripods emit each time they’re about to attack). They turn around–and Spielberg cuts to the reverse shot. And there it is, in an extreme wide shot–the image of an alien tripod looming over a hill not far from the landing in the foreground where passengers are struggling to save themselves. It’s a horrific image–straight out of a nightmare, primal and unsparing, and you know that there is no turning back or hedging. Spielberg doesn’t flinch from these scenes, he shows death and destruction in all their fury and tragedy. Also, I have to commend Cruise’s performance (yes, he’s an insane Scientologist, but he’s also a very shrewd and hard-working actor). His dockworker, Ray, feels completely believable, the working-class milieu that Spielberg portrays feels spot-on, and Ray’s relationship with his alienated children, Rachel (Fanning) and Robbie (Chatwin), are convincing as well. Spielberg shrewdly references memories of 9/11 as well: The bulletin boards cluttered with pictures of the missing, for instance, and the hysteria and desperation palpable in the faces of everyone on screen, not to mention the scale of the violence itself.

This then leads to the great and shattering disappointment that awaits us as we near the end of War of the Worlds. I have several problems: Ray is spared the cost that so many others in this movie suffer, namely to lose a loved one in a time of crisis, and Spielberg’s exempting Ray from the take-no-prisoners storytelling that came before it feels false, a cheat. It was as if another, lesser director took over in the Worlds’ final act, as if Spielberg suddenly felt impatient and uncertain about how to end this movie, ever eager to please his lowest common denominator audience. He should’ve known that staying truthful to the tone and themes (the costs of defending your community), rather than capitulating with sentiment, is how you win over your audience. As the credits rolled, I had to hide my head in my hands.

Also, why is it that an alien intelligence that’s supposedly kept its eyes trained on Earth for a million years couldn’t anticipate the bacteria factor? I realize this is how H.G. Wells’ story wraps up. But for it to have worked here, Spielberg and his scribes (big-budget machine David Koepp and this other guy) had to then infuse the theme of “germs” all throughout their story, rather than have it suggested arbitrarily in their movie’s climax. More crucially, why is it that the aliens waited so long to launch their attack? What was the point when they were a superior intelligence and killing force all along? Why not attack humanity when they were not so equipped with such lethal weapons? Also, why bother with death rays when a nuclear bomb can wipe out hundreds of thousands in a single blast? (Again, this last was a nod to Wells’ story, I understand, but it just doesn’t make sense anymore in the context of a total takeover and annihilation.) Easy answers are, sadly, all it would’ve taken to fix what are debilitating problems in an otherwise masterful exercise in humanist sci-fi moviemaking.

Grade: B

Directed by: Steven Spielberg
Written by: Josh Friedman, David Koepp
Cast: Tom Cruise, Dakota Fanning, Justin Chatwin, Miranda Otto, Tim Robbins

Avatar

January 10, 2010

Avatar is the quintessential Hollywood blockbuster. It operates on Big Effects, Big Action, Big Emotions, and Big Themes. By keeping things Big and borrowing on universal notions of myth-making, writer-director James Cameron has created an archetypal action-adventure with broad appeal. That might be understating it as, at this writing, Avatar has cracked the billion-dollar box office ceiling and continues to soar beyond The Lord of the Rings and Spider-Man flicks and on towards heights reached only by Cameron’s previous epic Titanic.

The film draws on very elemental emotions — one’s love and loyalty for heritage and personal history, one’s love of family and instinctual bond with children, family, and nature and, conversely, our mistrust of technology and any motive founded on industrial and imperialist ambition. Hence, identifying with its themes is a knee-jerk reflex, and you can’t help but feel used because of it; being a work designed to appeal to the largest possible audience, Avatar’s moral universe is rigorously black and white.

The story here is a variation on the Dances with Wolves template (or Pocahontas template, depending on your cinematic recall): A soldier from an encroaching civilization spends time with the members of the enemy, i.e. the people indigenous to the land, and, through the course of his interaction, gains not only respect and sympathy for them, but falls in love with one of their women (Avatar digresses from the Wolves example in that the woman in question is an actual, true-blood native). Meanwhile, the advancing forces to which our soldier belongs invade, and the soldier fights alongside his adopted brethren as they face the annihilation of their race. Visually, the film also bears more than a few echoes of Lord of the Rings, but, to Cameron’s credit, it also contains a wealth of texture and detail, both natural and technological, that Avatar can claim entirely for itself.

Avatar replaces Wolves’ Old West frontier for a futuristic milieu set on the lush and fantastical landscapes of Pandora — a moon on which humans have discovered a rare and much-prized mineral (Unobtainium, a MacGuffin if there ever was one). The deposits are detected directly below the settlement of the Na’vi — a race of highly intelligent, super-tall, blue-skinned beings that co-exist harmoniously with all living things on their world. Into this utopia arrives Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), a paraplegic ex-Marine back in service to infiltrate the Na’vi culture and gain their trust so that the humans can negotiate their re-settlement before blasting apart their land to get at the Unobtainium. But the more Jake spends time among the Na’vi, particularly with the headstrong and beautiful Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), the more he knows he cannot take up arms against them.

To be clear, it’s not Jake’s physical self that interacts with the Na’vi but his Avatar, a synthesized Na’vi-like extension of himself that he controls via a system of neural link-ups. Capable of manipulating his Avatar is exhilarating to Jake, not least because it gives him the sensation of having working legs again, and he revels in his Avatar’s superhuman movement, flight, and agility. Together with a scientific team led by the no-nonsense Dr. Augustine (Sigourney Weaver) — the leading expert on Pandora and its inhabitants — Jake becomes immersed into the Na’vi culture and customs, and, thanks to Neytiri’s conditioning, he becomes quickly adapted to the Na’vi’s spry lifestyle of scaling treetops and cliffs effortlessly, and taming dragon-like creatures which serve as the Na’vi’s aerial consorts.

When the humans do launch their inevitable invasion, Jake, Neytiri, and their comrades take to the skies or attack on their steeds, showering bows and arrows against all manner of fire-blazing military hardware. And this being an environmental sci-fi/fantasy, Pandora itself becomes a character, a living organism with a capacity for vengeance that cannot be ruled out. All of the above provide ample opportunities for Cameron and his production team to give us a feast of eye-popping panoramas, action scenarios, and bravura conceptual imaginings.

In broad strokes, Cameron paints an allegory of American expansionism — think 19th-century Manifest Destiny applied to an alien planet 150 years from now — with daubs of anti-corporate indignation thrown in. Avatar’s themes and sentiments are impossible to deny however thickly Cameron spreads it around because, in watching the plight of the Na’vi, we link what we see directly to atrocities in our own past and in our own world right now. What keeps us rooting for the movie — and what was also the case with Titanic — is the chemistry between its two disparate but fierce-hearted souls who genuinely fall in love with each other. Worthington and Saldana provide enough wattage to keep the film’s human center alive and beating, while Cameron wraps their story in an armature of generally impressive 3D attractions as well as a righteousness that’s touching yet all too simplistic.

Grade: B

Directed by: James Cameron
Written by: James Cameron
Cast: Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldana, Sigourney Weaver, Stephen Lang, Michelle Rodriguez, Giovanni Ribisi, Dileep Rao, Laz Alonso

Children of Men

November 9, 2009

childrenofmen_pic

Based on the novel by P.D. James, director and co-writer Alfonso Cuarón’s futuristic adventure derives its power from a premise as potent and primal as they come. Early in the 21st century, women are, suddenly and inexplicably, rendered infertile. No one knows why; reasons ranging from environmental pollution and genetic testing are cited as possible culprits. That’s neither nor there, however, because both mankind and civilization are rapidly unraveling. The world that Children of Men’s hero, Theodore Faron (Clive Owen), an erstwhile social activist, inhabits is riddled with political instability, terrorism, riots, economic crises and nuclear conflagrations. Britain has become a police state, violently quashing all discontent. Because of large-scale illegal immigration into Britain from less stable parts of the world, the country has adopted a violent policy against it. Everywhere we see police rounding up migrants into buses, hauling them off into Guantanamo-like detention camps. They’re ruthless in how they treat citizens who, in turn, have become disaffected, or else taken up arms in their struggle against the system. Terrorism and persecution widespread. The use of legalized over-the-counter euthanasia drugs is encouraged for all.

So it’s no surprise that when Baby Diego dies, everyone everywhere is sent into a grief-stricken tailspin. Reputedly the youngest man on Earth, Baby Diego is killed in a violent incident that characterizes the tenor of the times. The event underscores the fragility of the fate of our species, a twist of the proverbial knife already embedded in our backs. But Faron’s already inside his own grief vortex; twenty years ago, right around the time when pregnancy rates worldwide were dropping, he and his former wife Julian (Julianne Moore) laid to rest their own child. It was, in a way, the end of both their lives.

Those pieces in place, Cuarón shunts into action mode, “chase picture” mode to be exact, after Julian pays the disaffected Faron a surprise visit. She tells him about Kee (Claire-Hope Ashitey), a teenage girl who miraculously happens to be pregnant, and charges him with the task of transporting Kee and her nurse, Miriam (Pam Ferris), to the coast where they can be delivered into the hands of a benevolent organization called the Human Project. The existence of the Human Project is itself open to question, a rumor more than a fact, but it’s a chance Faron decides is worth taking; the world’s too dangerous to entrust with anything this precious. Faron’s not kidding either, for no sooner have they set out on the road than the group is set upon by sectarians determined to make Kee’s soon-to-be-born baby the poster child for their revolution.

Children of Men exudes an aura of effortlessness in how it lays out the particulars of its complex social and political realities. The pandemonium that wracks this future-world feels both logical and palpable; without that crucial sense of plausibility, Cuarón and company’s script would’ve been lost at sea. The same can be said of Cuarón’s assuredly brilliant direction, at much at ease with developing a range of absorbing characters as with staging one riveting action set piece after another. Owen creates the kind of hero you can’t help but immediately sympathize with and root for: Faron is a bedraggled Everyman, he has no power, no authority, and he wouldn’t know how to use a firearm if he found one in his hands. But, wounded by the loss of his own child, he’s the heart and soul of the picture, driven solely by his desire to save. And not just Owen; Children of Men is marked by high caliber performances throughout, particularly from Ferris, whose Miriam is Kee’s only protection and professional support; from Chiwetel Ejiofor whose militant leader Luke’s yearning for revolution becomes wrongly enmeshed with his desire to co-opt Kee’s child; from Ashitey whose Kee’s vulnerability is shielded only by her maternal pluckiness; and from the ever-watchable Michael Caine as a pot-smoking, lank-haired eccentric who’s the closest thing Faron has to a guide and benefactor.

Through a series of escapes and captures, Faron, Kee and Miriam manage to flee Luke and his organization only to wind up in a Homeland Security detention camp. In depicting their arrival at the camp, Cuarón’s acutely evokes, without exploiting, our collective incredulity for places like Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib. Cuarón’s sequence is frightening and bears the stamp of truth for anyone who’s seen images in the news of hooded prisoners, Gestapo-like guards, and unwholesome, barbed-wire ringed compounds. It’s at the camp that Cuarón’s direction (and his picture) gathers steam. He begins with an excruciatingly suspenseful sequence in which Faron tries to find Kee — in the final pangs of labor — a safe corner in these pellmell surroundings where she can give birth, and builds to a bravura climax as Faron must infiltrate a war zone to fetch Kee and her newborn. Cuarón’s courage and craftsmanship — together with the skills of his superb cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki — prove themselves in a shattering single-take sequence in which a very simple but enormously effective juxtaposition is established between the roar of gunfire against the crying of an infant as Faron tries to sneak mother and child out of a besieged building. A more mind-blowing display of technical virtuosity in tandem with emotional power hasn’t been burned into celluloid since the opening of Saving Private Ryan. At one point in Children of Men, Miriam comments how the voices of children are what keep the world from tipping into self-destruction. That sentiment is borne out precisely and perfectly in Cuarón’s final scenes.

All that keeps Children of Men from achieving masterpiece status is a greater sense of Faron himself. The script never delves deeply enough into Faron’s character; we know that he’s a burned-out shell of a man, haunted by feelings of fatelessness, but, of Faron’s inner life, we glean very little. Rather, he is a flat character who goes from one challenge to the next, as demanded by the story and with an attitude that remains the same whether he’s fetching a cup of coffee or a baby from a burning building. Faron should have been Cuarón’s bid to assert his personality over this material, an opportunity to provide his “spin” on the terrible state of the world (real and allegorical) and perhaps his own world-view as an artist. Children of Men gives us Cuarón the prodigal filmmaker, notching another success in a long string of them, though it comes frustratingly close to giving us Cuarón, the newly minted auteur.

Grade: A-

Directed by: Alfonso Cuarón
Written by: Alfonso Cuarón, Timothy J. Sexton, David Arata, Mark Fergus, Hawk Ostby
Cast: Clive Owen, Julianne Moore, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Charlie Hunnam, Danny Huston, Claire-Hope Ashitey, Peter Mullan, Pam Ferris, Michael Caine


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 481 other followers